Legal Opinion

United States v. Admiral Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1940No. 5685PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

In this appeal appellant, United States of America, intervenor below, attacks the fees and salaries allowed in receivership proceedings.

W. P. Weber sued Admiral Refining Company, a corporation, upon a series of notes and sought foreclosure of its alleged chattel mortgage lien on the company’s property, all situated on its refinery site in Gregg County. In connection with its prayer for appointment of a receiver pending litigation, he alleged, among other reasons, that defendant had permitted taxes to accrue to the State and the Federal Government in large amounts and had so…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brand v. DensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Hickey v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Levassor v. Metropolitan Fire Insurance Company's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Roberts v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Pink v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bergeron v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. L. Moody & Co., Bankers (Unincorporated)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
  4. Carole Kotz v. Stelian Murariu and Petru Murariu, Individually and on Behalf of Cape Horn Holdings LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
  5. Mortimer v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API