Legal Opinion

Flury v. Howard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 9, 1991No. 77058Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

OPALA, Chief Justice.

This court’s original cognizance is invoked primarily to invalidate an emergency protective order issued by the District Court, Logan County. We assume jurisdiction and, for the reasons to be explained, transfer the cause to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

I

THE ANATOMY OF DISTRICT COURT LITIGATION

A proceeding was commenced under the Protection From Domestic Abuse Act [Protection Act]2 by David and Janet E. Skaggs on behalf of their daughter, Janet *1053D., for protective order against the petitioner, Sean F. Flury [Flury], who had been in a dating relationship…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carder v. Court of Criminal AppealsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Henry v. MahlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Walters v. Oklahoma Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Anderson v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API