Legal Opinion
Wallace B. Shaw v. Harold Gwatney and John O. Marsh, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1986No. 85-1514PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue in this case is whether a district court, presented with a claim for less than $10,000 accrued back pay against the United States, has jurisdiction pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(a)(2), 1491 (1982), to ultimately award back pay in an amount greater than that statutory maximum. The District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas 1 made such an award in reinstating Wallace B. Shaw to his position as U.S. property and fiscal officer for Arkansas pending his proper removal by the U.S. Army in accordance with due process and the Army’s…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- CONNECTU LLC v. ZuckerbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Vietnam Veterans of America v. Secretary of the Navy, (Two Cases). Vietnam Veterans of America v. Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Captain James H. Smith v. Secretary of the Air Force, Verne OrrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- McGuire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Scherbatskoy v. Halliburton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.