Legal Opinion

Totten v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1959No. Civ. 18419PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.

This is a companion case to Talizin v. Oak Creek Biding Club, No. 18457, this day decided, ante, p. 429 [1 Cal.Rptr. 514]. Plaintiffs in this case, who will be referred to as “the Tottens,” are the defendants in that case. They had procured from the defendant insurers a policy of liability insurance, which was in effect at the time of the accident, but the insurers denied that the policy covered the liability asserted in the Talizin case. The Tottens therefore, after judgment went against them in the Talizin case, instituted this action against the insurers.

Two questions are presented: 1. Was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Pigeon Point Ranch, Inc. v. PerotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. General Insurance v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Soliz v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API