Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. King

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1998No. 97CA1082PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE. *

In this consolidated appeal of two separate workers’ compensation proceedings, the Sub sequent Injury Fund (SIF) seeks review of the final orders issued by the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which held it liable in each case for a portion of the death benefits awarded to Minnie Tsosie and Marian L. King (claimants). We affirm.

Claimants are the widows of uranium miners who contracted lung cancer as the result of them occupational exposure to radon. In each case, diagnosis of the lung cancer occurred in 1993 and the miners died in the fall of 1994.

In each case,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Renz v. Larimer County School District Poudre R-1Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Gianetto Oil Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Monfort Transportation v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. McCallum v. Dana's HousekeepingColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Lamar v. KoehnColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Union Carbide Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API