Legal Opinion

Pope v. City of Weatherford

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 2004No. 100,592PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

TOM COLBERT, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs, Eric and Anna Pope, appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Weatherford (City). The issue on appeal is whether the court erred in concluding that there was no issue of material fact presented on summary judgment such that Plaintiffs’ claim is time-barred as a matter of law. Upon review of the summary judgment record and applicable law, we conclude that the trial court erred because inferences required by the uncontested facts preclude a determination as a matter of law. We, therefore, reverse and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Ross Ex Rel. Ross v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Corn v. Comanche County Memorial Hospital AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API