Wheat v. Florida Parish Juvenile Justice Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partReeves, District Judge
I agree that Lillie Wheat’s retaliatory termination claim should proceed to trial, *712while her sexual harassment claim cannot survive summary judgment. Despite my agreement with much of the opinion, the majority errs when it finds no prima facie case of pre-termination retaliation. To reach that conclusion, the majority has to: (1) disregard record evidence, and (2) ignore the defendant’s concession in the district court that Wheat had made out such a prima facie case. I therefore must respectfully dissent.
I
When a person sues her former employer and succeeds, she may not be welcomed back with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Johnson v. City of ShelbySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Hoyle v. FREIGHTLINER, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Keenan v. TejedaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Freitag v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.