Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance v. Emery Air Freight Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 1, 1993No. 91 Civ. 8270 (CSH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Plaintiff Royal Insurance Co. (“Royal”) as subrogee of Corning, Inc. brings this action pursuant to the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air (“Warsaw Convention”), 49 U.S.CApp. § 1502, for negligence and breach of contract resulting in damage to an air shipment of ceramic substrate. Royal alleges that defendant Emery Air Freight Corp. (“Emery”) damaged the ceramic substrate while transporting it from the United States to South Korea. Emery moves pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kahn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Flanagan v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1977
- Data General Corp. v. Air Express International Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Joseph v. Syrian Arab AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- L. B. Smith, Inc. v. Circle Air Freight Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- FISHMAN BY FISHMAN v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Motorola, Inc. v. MSAS Cargo International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1998
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Kuehne & Nagel (AG & Co.) KGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Castro Ex Rel. Hernandez v. HinsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- New Pentax Film, Inc. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996