Legal Opinion

Wright v. Town of Camden

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The plaintiff in error, Wright, was arrested and fined $2 for violating Ordinance Number GB-24 of the Town of Camden. This ordinance in effect provided that people owning automobiles in the town should pay a certain license fee to the city for the purpose of operating said automobiles in the town. Wright refused to pay this fee because he considered the ordinance unconstitutional for various reasons. The trial judge under the authority of DeLay v. City of Chattanooga, 180 Tenn. 316, 174 S. W. (2d) 929, held the ordinance valid and affirmed the fine which had been entered against Wright by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Greyhound Lines v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Delay v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Memphis Retail Liquor Dealers' Ass'n v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Chattanooga v. VeatchTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Memphis v. Yellow Cab, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Drinnen v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API