Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 1, 1993No. 92-0739PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges his conviction for trafficking in cocaine in an amount greater than 200 grams but less than 400 grams, raising three issues on appeal. We agree that the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant’s post-trial motion for new trial, and we remand for a new trial.

Appellant was tried along with three code-fendants, none of whom testified at trial. Two other codefendants entered into plea agreements and testified for the state at the trial. These witnesses provided critical testimony linking appellant and his eodefendants to the crimes charged. In addition to this crucial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Gorham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Springle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peter J. Hidalgo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API