Peter J. Hidalgo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
After denying Peter Hidalgo’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court granted a certificate of appealability on the following issue: “Whether Petitioner’s Fifth Amendment right to due process was violated because the government affirmatively misrepresented facts to the jury and the trial court that the government knew or reasonably should have known were false.” The allegedly misrepresented facts go to the extent of the possible reduction in sentence that three government witnesses against Hidalgo could receive in exchange for their testimony and whether one of those witnesses would be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Richard Joseph Lynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Raymond L. Buckelew and James Laney Jenkins v. United States of America, Judson Lee Drane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. NyhuisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Felix v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020