Legal Opinion

In re Rosenau

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2016No. 16-BG-35PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This decision is issued as non-prece-dential. Please refer to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(d) governing the appropriate citation of this opinion.

In this disciplinary matter, Hearing Committee Number Five (“Committee”) recommends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. The violations stem from respondent Kenneth H. Rosenau’s failure to disclose during mediation that his client had died.

Based upon respondent’s recognition that he engaged in misrepresentation and that this misrepresentation seriously interfered with the administration of justice, he admittedly violated Rule 8.4(c)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. In Re OwensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Berhan DargieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. In re DargieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API