United States v. Bobby Lee Hedgecoe
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
The defendant pleaded guilty to two violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(a) (6) under which it is unlawful “knowingly to make any false * * * written statement * * * intended * '* * to deceive” a dealer in the purchase of a firearm. 1 He now appeals, asserting that Rule 11, F.R.Crim.P., was not observed in the taking of his plea. Since defendant was arraigned after the decision in McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S.Ct. 1166, 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969), there is no question that its holdings construing Rule 11 are fully applicable to him. Halliday v. United States, 394…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carl Walter Aiken v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Herbert Leon Gundlach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Frederick Harold Brokaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- James Cody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Calvin Demonsier ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Francis A. BehennaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. George R. StudnickaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Al BerlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.