Legal Opinion

Thornburg v. Chase

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 3, 1980PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

This is a boundary line dispute. Defendants own a tract of land adjoining tracts of land owned by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs in their complaint and defendants in their cross-action asked the trial court to establish their common boundary line pursuant to T.C.A., §§ 16-607 and 16-608.

The property owned by the parties at one time was owned by I. P. Chase, grandfather of defendant, Charles Chase. I. P. Chase devised the property to his sons, Nathan and Charles Ritter Chase, who later orally partitioned the property. Subsequently, the property of Nathan Chase was subdivided into…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Loftis v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  2. Pritchard v. ReboriTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Carr v. WilbanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  4. Webb v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  5. Cultra v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Wood v. StarkoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Mix v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. ACG, INC. v. Southeast Elevator, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Hamblen County Education Ass'n v. Hamblen County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  5. Carter v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API