Legal Opinion
Morrison Cafeteria Company of Nashville, Inc. v. Mitchell Lee Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1965No. 16219PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants have filed in this court a suggestion of mootness, together with a motion to vacate the judgment of the district court and to dismiss the instant appeal on the ground of mootness. Ap-pellee opposes the motion to vacate the judgment of the district court but does not resist the motion to dismiss the appeal.
The text of the suggestion of mootness and motion are set forth in the margin. 1 Affidavits to the effect that appellee is complying with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, have been filed in support of the suggestion of mootness, executed by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Brownlow v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Heitmuller v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Gray v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Tenn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Zantop Air Transport Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Eduardo Valdez v. L. Paul Applegate, District Manager, Albuquerque District, Bureau of Land Management, and Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Dr. Bertrand O. Tyson v. Lt. Clarence J. CazesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Brown v. FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Sam Wahyou, and v. Central Valley National Bank, a National Banking Corporation, W. A. Huggins and G. J. Ghiselli, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.