Legal Opinion

Rumsey v. Freeway Manor Minimax

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1968No. 14814PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

Appellants sued Freeway Manor Mini-max, a retail grocery store, herein called Minimax, and Echols Manufacturing Company, the manufacturer of “Echols King-tex”, a roach poison, herein called Echols, to recover damages resulting from the death of their three year old son, Bruce, who allegedly died as a result'of ingesting some of the roach poison which contained thallium.

After appellants rested their case, the trial court sustained the motion of Mini-max for an instructed verdict and at the conclusion of all evidence it instructed a verdict favorable to Echols. A judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Hubbard-Hall Chemical Company v. Charles L. Silverman, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  4. McClanahan v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  5. Gonzalez v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Odgers v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API