Black v. Horowitz
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. Contracts in general restraint of trade are void. Code, § 20-504. A contract concerning a lawful and useful business in partial restraint of trade and reasonably limited as to time and territory is not void. Hood v. Legg, 160 Ga. 620, 627 (128 S. E. 891); Strauss v. Phillips, 180 Ga. 641 (180 S. E. 123); Kutash v. Gluckman, 193 Ga. 805 (20 S. E. 2d, 128). 2. The contract in this case, restricting the right of the defendant Sorrells to engage in the business of roasting and blending coffee, and reasonably limited in time to five years, and in territory to the “Greater Atlanta…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Kutash v. GluckmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Ball-Thrash & Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Riley v. Royal ArcanumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Butler v. McClureSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Griffin v. VandegriffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Insurance Center, Inc. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Thomas v. Coastal Industrial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Aladdin, Inc. v. KrasnoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Mason v. Service Loan & Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.