Legal Opinion
Curtis Pearman v. Hale Abstract Company, Inc. (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 2020No. 20A-PL-733Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing FILED the defense of res judicata, collateral Oct 22 2020, 8:16 am estoppel, or the law of the case. CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Curtis Pearman John C. Trimble Lake Placid, Indiana Michael R. Giordano Lewis Wagner, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Curtis Pearman, October 22, 2020 Appellant-Plaintiff, Court of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Orr v. Turco Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987
- GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc. v. Elk Retail Investors, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- John E. Trytko, Jr. v. Hubbell, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Integrity Land Title Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.