Legal Opinion

Lassiter v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRksoN, J.

The questions involved: (1) Have the plaintiffs a right to maintain this action for recovery of property in dispute as heirs at law of grantor where deed does not contain clause of forfeiture or reverter? We think not. (2) Is title to trustees a fee when deed sets out that the property shall remain “vested in perpetuity to the above mentioned trustees and their successors in office” ? We think so.

It will be noted that the deed says: (1) “Have bargained and sold and by these presents do bargain, sell and convey to the said trustees and their successors in office.” (2) “The conditions of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. State v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Hall v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Brittain v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Station Associates, Inc. v. Dare CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Johnson v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Ange v. AngeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Johnson v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API