Stephenson v. Nassif
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge
This seven-count state tort action between non-diverse parties was initially filed in state court but then timely removed by defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1446(a) and 1442(a)(1), the so-called “federal officer” removal statute. Plaintiff now seeks a remand on the ground that this removal basis does not apply in this case.
Because the issues raised have been fully briefed, the matter is now ripe for disposition. Oral argument is unnecessary and dispensed with as it would not aid the decisional process. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connie JAMISON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry WILEY, Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Leo George Backer v. Philco Corporation, James J. Taglia v. Philco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- State of Maryland v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- State of West Virginia, ex rel, John B. McCuskey, Attorney General v. Apple, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026