Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cochran v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2003No. 2001-SC-0738-MRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCooper, Justice

I concur in the affirmance of all of Appellant’s convictions except his conviction of burglary in the second degree under Count 15 of the indictment. That charge dealt with the burglary of the former dwelling of Junior Caskey, deceased.

An additional (third) element which distinguishes third-degree burglary, a Class D felony, from second-degree burglary, a Class C felony, is the nature of the property in or upon which the offense occurred. If the property is a “building,” the offense is third-degree burglary, KRS 511.040(1); if it is a “dwelling,” the offense is second-degree burglary, KRS…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bray v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Colwell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Haynes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. BarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API