Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Reilly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1901Published

Appeal from Wayne; Waite, J. Bill by Charles Flowers and John E. Moloney, trustees for Bridget Hill, against Edward F. Eeilly, Nicholas Savage, and Matilda Hill, to quiet title. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The bill in this cause was filed in June, 1899, by the complainants as trustees, and recites that on the 6th day of February, 1896, in the circuit court for the county of Wayne, Bridget Hill recovered a judgment against the defendant Matilda Hill, alias Emma Clark, for the sum of $5,063.15; that on the 4th day of April, 1896, under a writ of fieri facias issued out of said court, the sheriff of Wayne county levied upon the property described -in the bill of complaint, which included the property on the corner of Jefferson avenue and the Boulevard, in fchfe city of Detroit, the subject-matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Cook v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Babcock v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API