Legal Opinion

Williams v. Thrall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for 'W’inne-bago county: Geo. W. Bureell, Circuit Judge. They argued, among other things, that the defendants having failed to rescind the contract or to ask that the furnace be replaced by another, and having accepted and used the one furnished, their measure of damages was limited to the difference between the value of the property, if as represented, and its value as it actually is.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for 'W’inne-bago county: Geo. W. Bureell, Circuit Judge. They argued, among other things, that the defendants having failed to rescind the contract or to ask that the furnace be replaced by another, and having accepted and used the one furnished, their measure of damages was limited to the difference between the value of the property, if as represented, and its value as it actually is. Herman v. Gray, 79 Wis. 189; Warder v. Fisher, 48 id. 338-342.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 11, 1898:

Cassoday, C. J.

The verified complaint is an ordinary complaint to enforce a mechanic’s lien, and alleges, in effect, that the plaintiffs, as principal contractors, sold, furnished, and put into the house of the defendant Thrall the combination hot-air and hot-water heating apparatus, for the agreed price of $460, and extras to the amount of $5.25, making $465.25; that no part thereof had been paid except $300; that there was still due and unpaid $165.25,— and prayed for the customary judgment.

*339The defendants Thrall and wife answered, to tbe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fuller-Warren Co. v. ShurtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Pormann v. WalshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nordin Construction Company v. City of NomeAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nunn v. BrillhartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Manitowoc Steam Boiler Works v. Manitowoc Glue Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. American Foundry & Furnace Co. v. Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Tilton v. J. L. Gates Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API