Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Carter

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 2, 2007No. SUCV200700098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fahey, Elizabeth M., J.

This action arises from a vehicle accident involving the plaintiff, John Reardon (Reardon), and defendant Ron Carter (Carter). Reardon alleges that he was injured by the tortious conduct of Carter. Reardon also alleges that Carter’s *230insurer, co-defendant Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Metropolitan), violated the provisions of Mass. Gen. Laws c. 93A and 176D by engaging in unfair claims settlement actions in the handling of his claims. Metropolitan seeks to sever the personal injury claims against Carter from the claims against it for unfair claims…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Clegg v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Wyler v. Bonnell Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  4. Roddy & McNulty Insurance Agency, Inc. v. A. A. Proctor & Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Kay Construction Co. v. Control Point Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeJesus v. Milford Regional Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API