Legal Opinion

Krieger v. Krieger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1905No. Gen. No. 11,907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Divorce proceeding. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward O. Brown, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The contention of counsel for plaintiff in error is, that the order of July 18, 1903, vacating the decree of June 26, 1903, and reinstating the cause, is void for want of jurisdiction, and that all orders subsequent to June 26, 1903, when the bill was dismissed, on motion of complainant’s solicitor, including the final decree of divorce, are void for want of jurisdiction.

The court, in the order of July 18, 1903, finds that it has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject-matter, and also finds that the defendant, Krieger, perpetrated a frauü on the court and on his own solicitor, Mr. James…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gage v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. First National Bank v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. People ex rel. Ellis v. HealyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Armstrong v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Sickle v. HarmeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API