Legal Opinion

Shearer v. Naftzinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:

This case presents an outwardly simple issue; namely, whether a judgment against *422personal property in Pennsylvania continues to “live” beyond the 20-year statute of limitations provided by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5529(a), pertaining to executions against personal property, if the judgment is revived by a writ of revival pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P. 3025-3033 before the 20-year period has elapsed. To answer this simple question, however, we have had to review the ancient writ of scire facias as that writ has evolved in Pennsylvania. Based on our review, we conclude that early in its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Owens v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Dominick v. Statesman InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Green Ridge Bank v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Lyon ex rel. Conklin v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennyhoff v. PappertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Dolan, L., Aplt. v. Hurd Millwork Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API