Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Osborn Watson, Jeffrey Craig Evenson, and Dale Stanley Browning

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1982No. 81-1306PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether a Coast Guard document and safety inspection of a 40-foot sailing vessel on the high seas after dark violated the Fourth Amendment. The stop and search was made without a founded suspicion that any maritime laws relating to safety or documentation were being violated. Citing our decision in United States v. Piner, 608 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1979), the district court granted defendants’ motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the stop. We reverse.

FACTS 1

The search and seizure occurred during a two week law enforcement patrol of the Coast Guard…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Timothy Nicholas Peterson, Darryl Ray Hood, Stephen Allen Falk, and Paul Jules GoudeauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheri Lynn BULACAN, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. John C. Humphrey, W.C. Garbez, and Robert D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. John Thompson, Steven Barfield, and Kim WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. SeljanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API