Legal Opinion
State v. Caulfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 5, 2006No. A04-1484Published
1Opinion of the Court
722 N.W.2d 304 (2006)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Scott CAULFIELD, Appellant.
No. A04-1484.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
October 5, 2006.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, State of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, Raymond F. Schmitz, Olmsted County Attorney, Daniel Paul Haugrud Reiff, Olmsted County Attorney, David F. McLeod, Assistant Olmsted County Attorney, Rochester, MN, for Respondent.
Roy G. Spurbeck, Assistant State Public Defender, Office of the Minnesota State Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Appellant…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.