Legal Opinion

Aderhold v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1935No. 24290PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

1. This is a companion case to that of Dr. T. M. Aderhold v. Bernice L. Stewart, decided by this court this day, 175 Okla. 72, 46 P. (2d) 340. Joe C. Stewart, plaintiff herein, is the husband of Bernice Li Stewart, in the companion case. He filed a separate suit for expenses and loss of services of his wife, due to the alleged negligence of defendant. The cases were consolidated and tried to the same jury. The verdict of the jury was for plaintiff herein for $734, and defendant appeals. The question of defendant’s negligence was settled in the consolidated case in favor of the plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan St. R. R. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Meek v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Furnish v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Aderhold v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. HookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Littlefield v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Nicholson v. BlanchetteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Howard v. Verdigris Valley Electric Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Carraco Oil Company v. MorhainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API