Legal Opinion

Bryan Brown v. Elizabeth Bowman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 2, 2012No. 11-2164PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the scope of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and whether the district court properly applied that doctrine to appellant’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. In April 2007, appellant Bryan Brown applied for admission to the Indiana Bar. As part of his application process, the Indiana Board of Law Examiners (BLE) requested that Brown attend hearings to investigate his application and also required Brown to be evaluated by mental health professionals. The BLE ultimately denied Brown’s admission application and, after exhausting his appeals to the Indiana Supreme Court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Cook County Circuit Court Probate DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Jose Andrade v. Hammond Board of Public WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. McDonald v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Hartford Life Ins. v. SolomonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  5. Spencer v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API