Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

The statement of the-nature and result of the case as stated by appellant we find correct, and is as follows:.

“On the 23rd day of November, 1912, a judgment was entered by the Fourteenth judicial district court of Dallas county, Tex., upon the application of appellee, Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Company, granting a temporary injunction against the-city of Dallas and its mayor and commissioners, and the city secretary, commanding them to abstain and refrain from asserting the validity of, or enforcing or attempting to enforce, a certain initiative ordinance adopted at a general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Sumner v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. City of Dallas v. Dallas Consolidated Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dewey v. Doxey-Layton Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Dallas Railway Co. v. GellerTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Glass v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Loboda v. Clark Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. MainOhio Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API