Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1926No. 26002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthkidge, J.

The appellant was indicted and tried for stealing an automobile, and was placed upon trial and convicted, not being represented at the time by counsel. After the jury had rendered a verdict of conviction, a motion was filed by attorneys employed after the conviction to set aside the judgment and grant a new trial. The motion was made on the following grounds:

“That the defendant was arrested on a charge of grand larceny, was taken into custody and tried before he could get in touch with his people and arrange his necessary defense. That at the time of his trial he was not apprised of the fact…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Booker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jordan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Harvey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Gordon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API