Legal Opinion
Dinkel v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1990No. 89-1686PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Beverly F. Dinkel, appeals from the district court order affirming the Secretary of Health and Human *316Services’ determination that she was employed in substantial gainful activity before she reached the age of 22 and, therefore, was not entitled to child’s insurance benefits. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
On January 8, 1987, claimant filed an application for child’s insurance benefits, alleging that she had been unable to work since birth due to deafness, blindness of the left eye, cerebral palsy, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kirk v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Mary Jo ANDERSON, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary, Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- Melinda BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Willard PAYNE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Miller v. ShalalaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Hartman v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Carter v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.