Legal Opinion
Martin v. Partridge
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1933No. 9588PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
For himself, as a bondholder-creditor, and on behalf of all creditors, as a class, ap-pellee filed his bill against the defendants, as individual stockholders and as representing all of the stockholders of the St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank, for recovery of the statutory double stock liability (12 USCA § 812). In that hill he stated some reasons for the appointment of a receiver to receive, collect, and disburse the ■ proceeds recovered from the stockholders for the benefit of the creditors. Shortly after filing this bill, ho filed a,n application for the appointment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Root v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Chicago Dollar Directory Co. v. Chicago Directory Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
- Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. Vincent Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Memorial Estates, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Cemco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Orth v. Transit Inv. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Partridge v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Holmberg v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Red Star Laboratories Co. v. PabstCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.