Legal Opinion
Mathews v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 12, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-1033PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORAH McCANN KING, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action arises out of the termination of the disability retirement benefits of plaintiff Richard Mathews. This matter is before the Court, with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), for consideration of two motions. Plaintiff1 filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on February 27, 2014. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Plaintiffs Motion”), ECF 26. Defendant Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (“OP-ERS” or defendant) opposed that motion and also moved for summary judgment. Defendant’s…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kerber v. Wayne CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Troy Harvey v. City of Troy, Ohio, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- United States v. Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- reVamped LLC v. Pipestone, City ofDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024