Legal Opinion · Dissent

J & C Marketing, L.L.C. v. McGinty

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2015No. 2013-1963Published

1DissentO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 24} I respectfully dissent.

{¶ 25} Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney Timothy J. McGinty appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s order compelling the state to produce certain confidential law-enforcement investigatory records in response to a discovery request filed by J & C Marketing, L.L.C., which had filed a declaratory judgment action in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court case No. CV-12-784234 seeking a declaration that its Internet sweepstakes cafés do not promote illegal gambling.

{¶ 26} At issue in this case is the law-enforcement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In re The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API