Legal Opinion

Ryan v. City of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1934No. 2135Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

PARSONS, J.

This case is before us upon plaintiff’s motion to quash and dismiss defendant’s bill of exceptions. Defendant’s bill sets forth two exceptions. Exception one has been abandoned. Exception two is in the following words: “Thereafter and at the conclusion of the case and after hearing the arguments of counsel on both sides, the honorable, the presiding judge of said court, on, to-wit, the 12th day of October, 1933, rendered and filed a decision finding in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of ten thousand dollars, and pursuant to said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. De Fraga v. Portuguese Mutual Benefit SocietyHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Zen v. Koon ChanHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Andrews v. PuahiHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ripley & Davis v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  5. McCandless v. Honolulu Plantation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API