Legal Opinion
Annan-Yartey v. Star Protection Agency, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2005No. 04-16077PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Star Protection Agency, Inc. (“Star”), his former employer, and several Star employees, in this wrongful termination and civil rights action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kang v. U. Lim Am., Inc., 296 F.3d 810, 814 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment on Annan-Yartey’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 because he failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Star terminated his employment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Raymond Vincent Nidds v. Schindler Elevator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph Fenner, Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph FennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmer Brothers Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Diana Estrada, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Price v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kevin Lawrence Jones v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026