Legal Opinion

Norwood v. Kenfield

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Tuolumne County. This was an election contest case, instituted, in the County Court to determine the title to the office of County Treasurer of Tuolumne County. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

This case has been here before. (30 Cal. 394.) When it went back for a new trial, the County Judge, on the 7th of November, 1866, made an order for a special term, to be held on the 20th of the same month, for the purpose of hearing and determining the contest, and directed the Clerk to issue a citation to Kenfield, the respondent below. On the 8th of November, after the citation had been served, on affidavit, showing that it would be inconvenient to try the case on the 20th, and on ex parte application of plaintiff, the County Judge, at chambers, issued an order to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bond v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Larco v. CasaneuavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Smith v. ChichesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Carpenter v. NutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Earls v. EarlsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Loesnitz v. SeelingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lord v. DunsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API