People v. Rogers
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Under the circumstances of this case, not the least of which is that the experienced defendant was the only participant in the plea bargaining process in a position to have firsthand knowledge as to whether the previous conviction was for a felony, we cannot say that the Appellate Division erred in limiting its corrective action to a grant of permission to the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea and substitute one of not guilty (cf. People v McConnell, 49 NY2d 340).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. ComptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. PascalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BenardNew York Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.