Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. North River Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1931No. 27899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action at law on a policy of fire insurance. It was concededly issued by the appellant, hereinafter designated as defendant, to the appellees, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, doing business as a partnership under the name and style of Richardson County Hatchery. Its terms insured the copartners “against all direct loss or damage by fire, * * * to an amount not exceeding Fifteen Hundred ($1,500) Dollars (for a definite period), to the *64following described property while located and contained as described herein, and not elsewhere, to wit: $1,500 on stock of merchandise * *…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bryce v. . Lorillard Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. State ex rel. Martin v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. London Assurance Corpn. v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Arendt v. North American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Calnon v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Co. of Hamilton, Ohio v. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NO. AMERICA v. County of HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Krug Park Amusement Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bonacorso v. Camden Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Roth v. Employers Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API