United States v. Johnny Moore
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TONE, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue before us is the relief that should be afforded to a defendant who has been convicted of both robbery and possession, when the cumulation of the two offenses was legally impermissible. We hold that a new trial is unnecessary, and that the conviction and sentence for possession should be vacated and the conviction and the sentence for robbery should be affirmed.
Defendant Johnny Moore was found guilty in a jury trial on one count charging violent robbery of a postal employee, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114, and on four counts charging possession of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Miguel SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Donovan Edward Ruby v. Secretary of the United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Jimmy Lee Williams, United States of America v. Jimmy Lee WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Hashagen, Clinton CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Vincent Edward BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Andrew Ford, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.