People v. Milza
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*719The hearing court properly refused to suppress evidence of the showup identifications of the defendant, since the identifications were conducted after the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant, and they took place at the crime scene within 20 minutes of the commission of the crime under conditions which were not unduly suggestive (see, e.g., People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023; People v Brnja, 70 AD2d 17, affd 50 NY2d 366; People v Kennerly, 117 AD2d 624, lv denied 67 NY2d 945). One-on-one confrontations which occur in close spatial and temporal proximity to the scene and time of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BrnjaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. TysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988