Legal Opinion

Abdullahi v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 25, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-3900Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IKRAM DAYIB ABDULLAHI, et al., : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 23-3900 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 5, 9 : ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official : capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL I. INTRODUCTION Ikram Dayib Abdullahi, Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi, Maryam Abdikadir Ali, Mustaf Mohamed Ibrahim, Farhiya Hefow Farah, and Salad Ahmed Halane (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this suit to compel Antony J. Blinken, in his…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API