Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1996No. 95-CA-24PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Jason Taylor appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a plea of no contest, upon the charge of carrying a concealed weapon. Taylor contends that the trial court erred by refusing to grant his motion to suppress certain evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless search of his car after a traffic stop.

We conclude that although the vehicle was lawfully stopped, its impoundment and inventory search were neither authorized nor justified. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. DavenportOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. DudleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. JamisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. GasparenoOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API