Legal Opinion

Brocklebank v. Eastern Financial Federal Credit Union

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1994No. 92-2495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. Section 687.0304, Fla.Stat. (1991); Griffiths v. Barnett Bank of Naples, 603 So.2d 690, 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (The court, in construing Section 687.0304 as to an oral credit agreement, upheld summary judgment in favor of the lender, stating that, “the absence of any written credit agreement bars an action against the bank on the credit agreement.”); see AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 515 So.2d 180 (Fla.1987); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 510 So.2d 899 (Fla.1987); Canell v. Areola Housing Corp., 65 So.2d 849 (Fla.1953); GAF Corp. v. Zack Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Fla. Power & Light v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Canell v. Arcola Housing Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. GAF Corp. v. Zack Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Ostman v. LawnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API