Legal Opinion
In Re Musgrave
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided April 25, 1939No. 3468-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.
Claimant, C. M. Williamson, filed a preferred claim for wages in the amount of $3,285.09. The trustee objected to the claim, whereupon the objections were tried before the referee who denied the claim because of insufficient evidence. The claimant filed a petition to review the referee’s order, alleging error in general terms.
Chapter 39(c) of the Bankruptcy Act of 1938, 11 U.S.C.A. § 67(c), and former General Order XXVII, 11 U.S. C.A. following section 53, require that the petition for review set out the error complained of. Here the petition for review…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re FlorsheimDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- In re LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Virginian Ry. Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- In re BraseltonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Helms Veneer CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1968
- In Re Deena Woolen Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1953
- Rosehedge Corporation v. Millie SterettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- In re Riddlesburg Mining Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- In re InmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.