Legal Opinion
West v. Shackelford
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
This writ of error was upon the refusal of a supersedeas in the case next preceding.
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. When a judgment refusing an interlocutory injunction is brought to the Supreme Court for review, the trial judge is authorized to grant a supersedeas upon such terms as may by him be deemed necessary to preserve the rights of the parties until the judgment of the Supreme Court can be had. Civil Code, § 5502; Stokes v. Stokes, 126 Ga. 804 (55 S. E. 1023). It is left, however, in the sound legal discretion of the judge to grant or refuse it. See Savannah, Florida *164& Western Ry. Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 113 Ga. 916 (39 S. E. 399).
May 15, 1912. This writ of error was upon the refusal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hutchins v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Tift v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Prater v. BargeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Hutchins v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956