Legal Opinion

Whitten Developments, Inc. v. Agee

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1974No. 74-80PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN A. Fogleman, Justice.

The sole error asserted by appellants for reversal of the decree of the chancery court rendering judgment against them on two promissory notes is the overruling of their demurrer and denial of their motion for transfer of the case to the circuit court. We find no error and affirm the decree.

Chester Agee contracted to sell Whitten Developments, Inc. two tracts of land in Craighead county for development as sub-divisions. Agee accepted two promissory notes for $56,000 each dated June 18, 1970, executed by Whitten Developments, Inc. and personally guaranteed by Lindsey…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. HarperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. McIlvenny v. HortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Lay v. GainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Sledge-Norfleet Co. v. MatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Reid v. KaroleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Bright v. GassCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Keith v. Barrow-Hicks Extensions of Water Improvement District No. 85Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Stolz v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API