Legal Opinion

McIlvenny v. Horton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1957No. 5-1210PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Seaborn Holt, Associate Justice.

This was a suit by William M. Horton and wife, sellers, against Michael Mcllvenny and wife, buyers, to recover $1,200 for an alleged breach of contract for the sale of real estate in Washington County. Trial was had in the Washington Chancery Court July 18, 1956, and at the close of appellees’ proof, appellants demurred, challenging the sufficiency of appellees’ evidence, — under the provisions of § 27-1729 Ark. Stats. 1947. The court overruled the demurrer. Appellants elected to stand on this demurrer, refused to offer proof or to plead further, whereupon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Wait v. StantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Love v. BrysonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. Stillwell v. Paepcke-Leicht Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. Dilley v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dairy Farm Leasing Co., Inc. v. HartleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Mattvidi Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Nationsbank of Virginia, N.A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Sundance Oil Co. v. Aztec Pipe and Supply Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Roberts Contracting Co. v. Valentine-Wooten Road PubLic Facility BoardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Lane v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API